
16 Open At-Large Candidates Breakdown
The 16 Open Division at USAV Nationals isn’t full just yet, not until the final six teams are selected through the at-large process. With six at-large bids available, there’s slightly more room than usual and it’s going to lead to intense debate about which teams deserve those spots the most. The reality is there are more than six teams with legitimate cases, which means a handful of clubs are going to be left out despite having legit arguments. Just like every year, there’s no exact formula. The selection committee has historically looked at: Head-to-head record vs. Open-qualified teams Finishes at national qualifiers Consistency across events Overall strength of schedule Using those factors as a guide, I’ve identified the top candidates from what I’ve gathered from looking into it. It’s not a perfect science and inevitably a few teams get overlooked. Still, I feel confident at least five of the six will come from this list, if not all six. However, there’s definitely a chance of someone being overlooked here. And while I do try to scour for all results, it can be difficult to obtain all results from every tournament, so I can’t guarantee with 100 percent certainty that every record against Open competition is totally accurate, but I feel strongly it’s very close and gives a strong enough indication as to which teams are in the mix. Tier 1: Leading Candidates South County 16 Nina (8–8 vs Open Field) One of the most complete résumés in the field. Winning percentage: .500 (best among candidates) Top finishes: 4th Red Rock; 9th Far Western Outlier: 19th Salt Lake I think when teams like South County miss out on a bid by one match, like it did at Red Rock by coming in fourth place, that’s a compelling argument in and of itself. Toss in the .500 record against Open competition and another Top-10 finish in Reno, and I feel like this team is as close to a lock of receiving one of the six spots as there is. *** Tstreet 16 Bailey (12–13 vs Open Field) High volume, high credibility. Matches vs Open teams: 25 (the highest total) Winning percentage: .480 (2nd highest) Finishes: 9th Windy City; 14th Boston Tstreet has played a loaded schedule and held its own. A near .500 record with that many matches is a strong signal it belongs. I think one question that always has to be considered is this team going to be able to compete in 16 Open if selected? Without a doubt the answer is yes. This isn’t an at-large selection that would only pick up one victory at nationals. So if I were Tstreet, I would be feeling really good about being selected. I would be shocked if Tstreet wasn’t picked. *** KC Power 16-1 (10–13 vs Open Field) Strength of schedule and winning percentage makes for a legit case. Wins vs Open: 10 (second-most in this group) Top finish: 5th Boston Other showings: 20th MEQ; 14th Windy City; 14th Show Me Average finish: 13th To put up 10 wins against the field in 23 matches kind of points to KC Power just not winning at the right time in order to qualify outright. Still, that’s a lot of contests against strong competition and with 10 victories, KC Power is the only other team outside of Tstreet on this list to reach double-digit victories against the Open field. Add in the 5th-place finish at Boston and I really believe KC Power deserves one of the six spots. *** Tier 2: Definite Contenders BSVBC 16 Black (5–6 vs Open Field) Efficient and effective. Winning percentage: .455 Top finishes: 9th MEQ; 9th Show Me BSVBC finished in second place in 16 USA at Sunshine early on, then played in Open at both MEQ and Show Me, finishing in the Top 10 at each. In a year where there might be only two or three at-larges, it would be hard for BSVBC to pick up one of the spots. However, with six available, I think BSVBC has a very strong case to be among the six. And if not BSVBC, then who? *** Paramount 16 Maureen (4–5 vs Open Field) Quietly one of the more intriguing cases. Average finish: 11th Top finishes: 6th Big South; 9th Boston Other finishes: 15th Show Me; 14th Northern Lights Paramount is another team in contention which was one victory away from qualifying outright. It happened at Big South, where a sixth-place showing left the club on the cusp of earning a bid. At the same, even playing four national qualifiers, Paramount only played nine matches against eventually Open qualifiers, which is a bit low and suggests the qualifiers weren’t the deepest. Still, a 4-5 mark is very solid and I believe Paramount definitely deserves strong consideration. *** Vegas Aces 16 Ren (6–8 vs Open Field) Small sample, strong results. Finishes: 7th Red Rock; 7th West Coast Winning percentage: .429 It looks like Vegas Aces played in just two qualifiers, but did produce a pair of 7th-place results. And it’s 6-8 mark against the Open field is on par with others in this tier. So who knows? Like we said, with so many teams with very similar arguments, not everyone is going to be happy. But Vegas Aces should get serous consideration. *** Co Jrs 16 Sherri (6–9 vs Open Field) Both positives and negatives. Top finish: 9th Salt Lake Notable: Played for a bid at Salt Lake Add Co Jrs to the group which was one victory away from qualifying. Co Jrs was in the mix on the final day of Salt Lake – the toughest and deepest qualifier of the season – and finished one win shy of qualifying outright. That, and a 6-9 mark against the field would be why Co Jrs gets selected. If not, it could be Co Jrs finishing 19th at NEQ and 18th at Far Western that keeps them out. *** Tribe 16








